http://thebull.macsimumweb.com/java-is-safe-for-now Thoughts on poker, programming and other stuff. Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:40:34 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://thebull.macsimumweb.com/java-is-safe-for-now/comment-page-1#comment-13950 The Bull Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:54:34 +0000 http://thebull.macsimumweb.com/?p=329#comment-13950 Precisely because HP doesn't have an investment. Because of that they will likely keep the java team and java products. IBM on the other hand would throw out everything that competes with them and that would be a bad thing. Precisely because HP doesn’t have an investment. Because of that they will likely keep the java team and java products. IBM on the other hand would throw out everything that competes with them and that would be a bad thing.

]]> http://thebull.macsimumweb.com/java-is-safe-for-now/comment-page-1#comment-13909 scot Tue, 07 Apr 2009 06:06:03 +0000 http://thebull.macsimumweb.com/?p=329#comment-13909 i reckon that's idle speculation at best. Why would you think HP would be better for Java? IBM are certainly already "invested" in Java. Many of their platforms are design to run it, run on it or integrate to it. HP and Cisco are not. It's possible that they would kill Java - it's just all expenditure and no revenue to them. i reckon that’s idle speculation at best. Why would you think HP would be better for Java? IBM are certainly already “invested” in Java. Many of their platforms are design to run it, run on it or integrate to it. HP and Cisco are not. It’s possible that they would kill Java – it’s just all expenditure and no revenue to them.

]]>